You don’t matter.
There aren’t many things I give a damn about, but I do give a damn about the hideous tragic farce that is the Nobel Prize for Literature. I’ll go to any extent to correct misconceptions of it. Even to the depths of hell itself: as proved when I ventured down into the Fifth Circle, which as Dante taught us is reserved for Harry Potter fans. I recently even corrected a fairly excited stub on the TV3 website (I know, I know) about the crew of the Spirit of New Zealand, who are being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. They might win! Like Gandhi did, wow! Yeah, how about this for a story:
“Young Man Buys Lottery Ticket
‘It’s possible I may win money from this!’ he claims”.
There’s a couple of things you need to know about the Nobel Prize. Pretty much any tenured University Professor can nominate a candidate in their respective field. Neat! But what this actually means is that every Professor of Fried Chicken & Genocide from the South Dakota University of Etiquette is going to nominate someone like William Luther Pierce for that colossus of eridition: The Turner Diaries. I’ll bet you two fiddy that Mugabe has been nominated for a Peace Prize. Someone out there is bound to have a sense of humor.
The Nobel nominee list is kept private for at least fifty years after the nomination. And even then: try googling for a Nobel nominee list. I haven’t found one. That’s because it’s full of embarrassments, like the time Hitler was nominated for Mein Kampf, or the time Licio Gelli was nominated, for God knows what.
This whole Nobel silliness reached it’s peak during the Stanley Tookie Williams trial. They actually used in his defence the fact that his childrens stories had been nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature. What a fantastic defence: all I have to do is publish a book, bribe a professor, and murder as I please: if I’m nominated for a Nobel Prize, how could I possibly be anything but meek and bookish?
It is also important to not treat the laureates as belonging to some exalted canon, seconded only by the chorus of angels. There’s plenty of evidence that Mother Teresa was more shrewd and manipulative than we’d prefer to think. What was the hell with was giving a Peace Prize to… Kissinger? (the equivalent is giving one to Cheney for this years commitment toward peace). It’s a hit and miss affair. It’s crowning achievements, like the awards to Faulkner and Ossietsky, are shadowed by the lightweights (ie: Jelinek) and the undeserved. Winning the prize is just as likely to mean that you’ll be remembered as a bungled political decision as a great avatar of idealism.
My recommendation though is if you’re bored, online, and want to read something inspiring, check out some of the Nobel speeches online. I’ve only read some of the literature ones, I can recommend Pinter, Milosz, Kertesz, and of course Faulkner.